Reproduced below is the text of the lecture delivered by me at Witwatersrand University,
Johannesburg in South Africa on 27 February 2015 on the topic
At a time when both in India and
South Africa Gandhi’s 21 years of initiatives and struggles for justice and human rights and his leadership
since the 100 years of his return to India
from South Africa are debated, remembered and celebrated with considerable
public interest, Dr.Mandela’s views assume significance:
“
India is Gandhi’s country of birth; South Africa his country of adoption. He
was both an Indian and a South African citizen. Both countries contributed to
his intellectual and moral genius, and he shaped the liberatory movements in
both colonial theaters…He is the archetypal anti-colonial revolutionary. His
strategy of noncooperation, his assertion that we can be dominated only if we
cooperate with our dominators, and his nonviolent resistance inspired
anti-colonial and anti-racist movements internationally in our century”(December 27,1999/ Web
posting by Nelson Mandela).
Similarly Dr Nelson Mandela’s
address at the unveiling of Gandhi Memorial at Pietermaritzburg on 6 June, 1993
is a penetrating analysis of the gradual evolution of Gandhi and his legacy to
humanity and how particularly South
Africa shaped his Thought and Action:
“Gandhiji
influenced the activities of liberation movements, civil rights movements and
religious organizations in all five continents of the world. He impacted on men
and women who have achieved significant historical changes in their countries
not least amongst whom are Martin Luther King. Mahatma Gandhi came to this
country 100 years ago, to assist Indians brought to this country as indentured
labourers and those who came to set up trading posts. He came here to assist
them to retain their right to be on a common voters roll.
The Mahatma is an integral part of our
history because it is here that he first experimented with truth; here that he
demonstrated his characteristic firmness in pursuit of justice; here that he
developed Satyagraha as a philosophy and a method of struggle.”
These observations of Dr. Mandela,
is a clear rebuttal of the prevailing notion in many circles that Gandhi’s
influence was limited to the Indian segment in South Africa and Gandhi’s work
did not generate any popular interest among the local population in South
Africa. It also effectively nails the lie, orchestrated and perpetrated by the
vestiges of the very forces Gandhi fought all his life , both in South Africa
and India.
What Rev.Joseph J Doke, a contemporary of Gandhi in Johannesburg wrote about Gandhi 79 years before Dr Mandela
made the above observation would perhaps give a historical perspective of the
prevailing situation in South Africa when Gandhi was described
“in
this country, even by responsible persons, as an ordinary agitator, his acts
have been misrepresented as mere vulgar defiance of the law, there have not
even been wanting, suggestions, that his motives are those of self interest and pecuniary profit”.
To
illustrate this point further let me quote Dr Mandela again:
”The
Indian Congresses which have their origin in this period were fashioned by
Gandhi as instruments with the assistance of people like ThambiNaidoo, Parsi
Rustomji, E I Asvat and others to achieve Hindu-Muslim unity in a just
cause...Today as we strive to achieve a date for the first democratic elections
in this country, the legacy of Gandhiji has an immediate relevance. He
negotiated in good faith and without bitterness. But when the oppressor reneged
he returned to mass resistance. He combined negotiation and mass action and
illustrated that the end result through either means was effective.
Gandhi
is most revered for his commitment to non-violence and the Congress Movement
was strongly influenced by this Gandhian philosophy, it was a philosophy that
achieved the mobilisation of millions of South Africans during the 1952
defiance campaign, which established the ANC as a mass based organisation. The
ANC and its congress alliance partners worked jointly to protest the pass laws
and the racist ideologies of the white political parties…
The
enemies that Gandhi fought—ignorance, disease, unemployment, poverty and
violence are today common place in a country that had the potential to lead and
uplift Africa. Today we are faced with the formidable task of reconstructing
our country anew. Now more than ever is the time when we have to pay heed to
the lessons of Mahatma Gandhi”.
Gandhi
emerges the voice of the voiceless and fighter for justice and human rights
The very first lesson the young
barrister Gandhi who was just 24 years old learned soon after he reached South Africa was to face
the realities of life and stay and suffer if need be in the realization of
one’s goal.
The humiliation he suffered at the
Pietermaritzburg Railway station on 7th June 1893 was converted by him into an
opportunity to reflect on the potential of every human being to become an
agent of change. Gandhi later wrote
in his autobiography:
“I
was afraid for my very life. I entered the dark waiting room.There was a white
man in the room. I was afraid of him.What was my duty?I asked myself. Should I
go back to India,or should I go forward with God as my helper,and face whatever
was in store for me? I decided to stay and suffer My active nonviolence began
from that date”.
While the Pietermaritzburg railway station experience
offered him a foretaste of what was in store for him, the five days journey
from Durban to Pretoria proved to be one of the most ‘creative experiences’ of
his life. He saw racism ‘face to face’
and ‘in action’ revealing all its fangs. He was surprised to learn how the
Indian merchants and others had been
silently and with resignation probably swallowing such humiliation without a even a murmour or protest. He realized that he had to tighten his girdle and marshall all
his resources besides developing new methods and strategies to counter the most
illogical racism which had no legitimate
place in the British Empire.
Except a steely determination and adhrence to truth which
Gandhi had kept as his constant companion
and inspiration since his
England days, Gandhi had no model or
source or support to draw from or rely
upon when decided to take head on racism
and challenge the powerful racist perpetrators and violators of human dignity
and human rights.
It may be noted at this point that
young Gandhi arrived in South Africa as an attorney to assist a South African firm in a law suit.He had no
political interest nor did he visualise any other role and was preparing to go
back to his home country as soon as the law suit was settled.
It
is worth remembering at this point that Gandhi did not begin his work as a
campaigner or a social or political activist or agitator. A sensitive human being
moved by the pitiable conditions under which fellow human being were losing
their identity gradually threw him in the vortex of stormy and harsh realities
.The harsh realities the South
African Indians were subject to prompted him to play the role
of a deliverer they were awaiting for.
Once determined to throw his lot with the suffering humanity
the first step Gandhi adopted was to familiarize himself with the conditions of
the Indians and others in the colony. This was followed by a subtle process of
educating the Indians on the need to
shed fear, and sloth, Develop cleanliness, Foster unity,
Abhor personal & social evils, Be compassionate to others Cultivate
personal integrity and develop a vision for tomorrow. Develop a community
consciousness and self esteem.
As he started challenging the racist regime attacks on Gandhi also became
stronger and this did not deter
the young activist’s resolve to fight
against the racist regime. When in 1906, the colonial government sought to
impose the Transvaal Asiatic Law Amendment Ordinance, which required all
Indians to register themselves again, Gandhi immediately resorted to action the
kind of which no country had ever witnessed. The Passive resistance/ the satyagraha as it was known was a novel
method of public protest hitherto unheard of. It gave a jolt to the racist
South African government. Several
demands were conceded by the authorities. Notable among them were abolition of
the requirement for the Indians to register and carry passes. The shelving of
tax of $ 3, the system of indenture also was discontinued and Indian marriages
were recognized. Though quite a few other demands were not conceded at one
stroke it appeared ‘protestor’ and ‘brief less barrister Gandhi had catapulted
on to the mainstream of South African Indian life.
Well, the later developments and the
courage and foresight displayed by the youngster who emerged from the ill-lit
(dark?) waiting room of the Pietermaritzburg Railway station proved that he was
no longer the timid and frightened foreigner who was forced out of the train. The
night of eviction led to an inner awakening to stand up and fight against the
denial of justice and human rights. The mortifying experience gave him a rare
courage and fresh insights and determination to fight out nonviolently the
prevailing inhumanity and cruelty and to live for others, notwithstanding the
hurdles that lay before him.
Very soon Gandhi found that in
Natal, a charge was made against the Indians that they were slovenly in their
habits and did not keep houses and surroundings clean. It is here Gandhi began
his work, he tried to educate them. He played an active role when plague was
reported in Durban. He realized that just as untouchables were relegated to
remote quarters of a town or a village in India, Indians in South Africa were
given coolie locations or ghettoes. There was a criminal negligence of the
municipality. Plague broke out in one of the gold mines and not in the coolie
locations. Gandhi plunged in the relief work. Later, municipality wanted to
evict Indians and burn the ghettoes. Gandhi fought legal cases and got the
municipality to pay compensations. Thus, he fought for ‘untouchables’, both
Indians and other blacks in Africa.
What did South Africa give
Gandhi?
The twenty-one years Gandhi spent in
South Africa offered valuable insights to Gandhi in familiarizing himself with
the in human and highly deplorable situations that existed outside, as well as
helped him develop appropriate concepts and techniques of nonviolent defense.
His decision to defy the most humiliating Asiatic
Ordinance with nonviolent strategies included suffering and readiness to atone
the mistakes committed by others.
Like a master craftsman he developed the various instruments
of nonviolent resistance to evil.
The struggle initiated by Gandhi for human dignity and
freedom had not only lasting impact on South Africa and India but it also left
its imprints on human psyche and influenced freedom fighters and human rights activists
all over the world.
The Gandhian initiative for human
rights and dignity stands out for the fresh set of strategies and attitudes
which Gandhi brought in. Many could not initially understand what he meant when
he asserted:
“A
clear victory of satyagraha is impossible so long as there is ill will. But
those who believe themselves every morning in it have to make the following
resolve for the day:
I
shall not fear anyone on earth. I shall fear God only: I shall not bear ill
will towards any one on earth.
I shall fear no injustice from anyone. I shall conquer untruth by truth and in resisting untruth I shall put up with all suffering.”
I shall fear no injustice from anyone. I shall conquer untruth by truth and in resisting untruth I shall put up with all suffering.”
Freedom
from fear
Gandhi brought in a new era of
nonviolent defense based on the ability of each human being to free himself/herself
from fear. He believed that fearlessness becomes a major pillar on which to
build together with love and the capacity to resist when necessary.
It
is interesting to see that Gandhi conceives fearlessness as a condition for
love. He who is weak cannot love, probably because he or she is not free
enough, does not have the surplus of warmth and energy from which love can come
forth.
“My mission is to teach by example and precept
under severe restraint the use of the matchless weapon of satyagraha, which is
a direct corollary of nonviolence and truth. I am anxious, indeed I am
impatient to demonstrate that there is
no remedy for many ills of life save that of nonviolence. When I have become incapable
of evil and when nothing harsh or naughty occupies, be it momentarily, my
thought world, then, and not till own, my nonviolence will move all the nearest
of the world. I have placed before me and the reader no impossible ideal or
ordeal. It is mans prerogative and birthright.”
Nobel Laureate Tagore was among the
first world leaders who appreciated the Gandhian strivings for human rights. He
explained movingly how Gandhi identified himself with the poorest of the poor.
He wrote,
“He
stopped at threshold of the huts of the thousands of dispossessed, dressed like
one of their own. He spoke to them in their own language. Here was living truth
at last, and not only quotation from books. For this reason the Mahatma, the
name given to him by the people of India, is his real name, who have felt like
him that all Indians are his own flesh and blood..When love came to the door of
India that door was opened wide. At Gandhiji’s call India blossomed forth to
new greatness, just as once, before, in earlier times; when the Buddha
proclaimed the truth of fellow-feeling and compassion among all living
creatures.”
Humanism
in Practice
Gandhi
advanced his perspective that the good
of one and the good of all and vice versa through his vision of Sarvodaya
(welfare of all) is in
essence the spirit of humanism recast and remodeled along the Indian saying: Vasudhaiva
Kutumbakam (global human family). It also echoes Ruskin’s Unto This Last
from which Gandhi drew the humanistic spirit of Sarvodaya:
1.
That the good of the individual is
contained in the good of all.
2.
That a lawyer’s work has the same
value as the barber’s in as much as all have the same right of earning livelihood
from their work
3.
That the life of labour, i.e., the
life of the tiller of the soil and the handicraftsman is the life worth living.
Soul-force
against brute-force of violence
Gandhi demonstrated all aspects of both individual and
collective initiatives for the liberation of people from colonial rule through
emphasis on the soul-force as against the brute force of violence. The eternal
warfare between truth and untruth, between good and evil in individuals,
groups, communities and among nations is what Gandhiji’s life-long struggle symbolized.
Freedom to Gandhiji was a process of
continuing quest rather than a final consumption. Similarly independence to him
was not an end but a means to freedom and self-rule. His concept of swaraj went
far beyond mere political independence.
In his struggle against colonial rule, Gandhi marshaled
the allegiance of the hapless indentured and fear-stricken laborers in South
Africa and the common people of India to a common cause: it was Swaraj,
which meant “not the acquisition of authority by a few, but the acquisition
of the capacity in the many to regulate authority when abused.”
Gandhi,
an embodiment of democracy in action
Gandhiji was thus a living embodiment of democracy in
action. He knew more than anyone else living then or now, that political
democracy is indivisible from economic and social democracy. Thus followed the
logical corollaries to his approach to the struggle for the emancipation of the
masses from the grind of hunger ,unemployment and the tyrannies of castes and
religions which made bond slave of the oppressors and the oppressed alike.
He also revolted against the pattern of technology that
enslaved man and made him helpless robots.
He crusaded against all forms of segregation whether it is
the racial or color bar in South Africa or the abominable untouchability as practiced
in India because both epitomized the cancer that ate into the social and
political life of India and South Africa.
Gandhi’s
influence on Universal Declaration of Human Rights
One can see considerable influence
of Gandhi in the various articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
In its 30 Articles, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defines that
those principles are intended to offer a common standard of achievement for all
peoples’ and all nations.
The first three articles proclaim that all human beings
are born free and equal in dignity and rights, are endowed with reason and
conscience, should act toward one another in a spirit of brotherhood, and are
entitled to all rights and freedoms without any kind of distinction. Everyone
has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 4 to 21 spell out various civil and political
rights, including those to freedom from slavery; from torture to cruel, in
human or degrading treatment or punishment; the right to recognition as person
before the law and to equal protection by the law against abuse of rights to
freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile; die right to fair public
hearing before an independent impartial tribunal and the right to be presumed
innocent until proved guilty. Other civil rights include freedom from arbitrary
interference with privacy, family, or correspondence; freedom of movement and
residence; the right to nationality and asylum; die right to marry and found a
family; to own property; to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, opinion
and expression; the right to peaceful assembly and association but equally that
of not belonging to an association; and me right to take part in the government
of one’s country and of equal access to its public service- Finally, “the will
of the people shall be the basis of the authority of Government”, which shall
be expressed in periodic elections by universal suffrage and secret of free
voting procedures.
The concluding articles (28 to 30) proclaim
that everyone is entitled to social and international order in which the
declarations and rights and freedoms may be fully realized. Conversely, since
everyone has duties to the community, the exercise of such rights and freedoms
shall be limited only to laws designed solely to secure recognition and respect
of the rights of others and to meet requirements of public order and the
general welfare in a democratic society. No state, group or individual may
claim the right to destroy any right contained in the Declaration.
Gandhi’s
stress on human dignity
It could be seen thus that Mahatma
Gandhi opened up a new chapter in human history by offering a new set of
thoughts and strategies steeped in human dignity. He also taught that any
attempt to violate human rights is abominable and against natural justice,
hence should be fought tooth and nail. His life and work in South Africa for
twenty-one years and thirty years in India championing the cause of the
down-trodden and oppressed who were segregated and ill-treated in the name of
the dreaded apartheid inspired millions of freedom-loving citizens all over the
world including the poet and social reformer, Tolstoy. Gandhi demonstrated the
world through his novel methods that
what the weak and the suppressed need is courage of conviction to stand up and
fight any unjust system. He clarified with telling effect that the weapon of
the weak in this noble fight for social justice and equal rights is not any
material weapon but soul-force which is more powerful than even the atom bomb,
and which in turn, will arm a nation or a person with the requisite courage to
fight the forces which deny fellow human beings their right to live in dignity.
Gandhi
inspires civil right movements and freedom fighters across the world
In his fifty years of public life in
three continents, Gandhi demonstrated the efficacy of the Buddhist teachings of
respect for all living beings and human dignity which is impossible without
compassion. Gandhi emerged as the voice of the voiceless, and inspired social
reformers, political thinkers and fighters for individual liberty all over the
world.
From Martin Luther King and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan to
Julius Neyrere, Hochi Min, Bishop Desmond Tutu, Petra Kelley and Nelson
Mandela, there is a galaxy of men and women in different parts of the world who
took a leaf from Gandhi to fashion their initiative for ensuring justice and fought
discrimination in the name of colour and race.
And with Gandhi the
fight against Human Rights took a new turn. From violent methods the movement
turned to nonviolent tactics which Gandhi believed would be the weapon of the
strong and not that of the weak.
The
Alchemy of Forgiveness
The Gandhian Satyagraha proved to be a very dangerous
weapon in the hands of the nonviolent fighters of justice and human rights. It
meant many things to many. While it was both spiritual and moral to some it was
a strategy and method to few others. To Gandhi the originator of this novel and
dangerous weapon it was a creed, vow of allegiance to truth.
As Fisher, one of
Gandhi’s biographers said, ‘this vow meant not only loyalty to truth from a
subjective viewpoint- that is, that he himself would never lie: it meant also
an insistence, an objective insistence, upon the application of truth to the
problems of daily life’. “If a principle is worth anything, it’s worth living,”
says Gandhi.
Living the Truth
The later
initiatives of Gandhi in South Africa where he established the Phoenix
Settlement and the Tolstoy Farm, the commencement of the newspaper Indian
Opinion revealed Gandhi’s strenuous adherence to ‘living the truth’ This
passion for living the truth gradually paved the way for many changes in
Gandhi’s personal life both in South Africa and India.
There are critics and historians who hold the view that
Gandhi did not achieve much in South Africa . There is no doubt that the South
African experience made Gandhi confident and perhaps prepared him for a
protracted struggle against the British rule in India. He might not have
achieved what he strove, but he ‘returned home with a new method of action and
a long-mediated programme for India’s regeneration’.
Satyagraha was new mode of protest that Gandhi had crafted
and tested in his struggle against racism in South Africa. The strength of
satyagraha lies in human suffering. As Gandhi himself elaborated, ‘even before
satyagraha was started, the satyagrahis knew that they would have to suffer
even unto death, and they were ready to undergo such suffering.
Since the spirit of revenge being alien to a satyagraha,
it was best for a satyagrahi to hold his peace when he encountered
extraordinary difficulties in proving the fact of his suffering.
The second significant achievement was his success in
mobilizing the disparate Indians in South Africa who were divided on various
ethnic counts. The Indian Ambulance Corps that was founded during the 1899 Boer
War was illustrative of his effort in bringing the deeply divided Indians
together. Given its multi-cultural character, the corps was characterized as ‘a
microcosm of all classes and creeds. …..Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Sikhs,
Madrasis and up countrymen (sic), free Indians as well indentured labourers’.
This tradition was firmly established in the Phoenix
Settlement in Natal and later Tolstoy Farm in Johannesburg. However, Gandhi’s
focus on the Indian cause ‘prevented him from involving the non-Indian Africans
as potential political allies’.
In defense, one can
argue that Gandhi was concerned with the Indians who were subject to racist
discrimination and hence he concentrated on them. Moreover, because he
attributed racism to mere colour prejudice, he believed that this was something
‘quite contrary to the British tradition and only temporary and local’. He
perhaps missed out the serious structural implications of racism for South
African society.
Thirdly, the South African experience also helped Gandhi
conceptualize the nature of Western industrial civilization. In his Satyagraha
in South Africa, he developed his critique of Western civilization that he
expanded in a sophisticated form in Hind
Swaraj. He did not approve of the ‘philosophical substance’ of arguments,
made by ‘highest character among the European’ in defense of the superiority of
Western machine civilization. There were, however, two arguments that need
attention: first, as the arguments in favour of Western civilization runs, it
was neither vulgar racism nor brute trade jealousy that justified draconian
governmental feat; what was at stake was the preservation of the distinctive
character of the Western civilization that would be diluted if cross-cultural
communication was allowed.
Hence the aim was ‘on of preserving one’s own civilization,
that is of enjoying the supreme right of self-preservation and discharging the
corresponding duty’. Secondly, in order to gratify this desire, the Western
nations had adopted various measures to avoid ‘distortions’ in Western
civilization. Gandhi challenged the major arguments defending racist
exploitation by the South African government. In his opinion, no civilization
would ever lose its dynamics simply because of contact with others; in fact,
cross-cultural borrowing would enrich its contents. He was critical of the idea
that ‘nations which do not increase their material wants are doomed to
destruction’. This remained at the root of the Western nations’ expansionist
strategy. It was in pursuance of this strategy that ‘Western nations have settled
in South Africa and subdued the numerically overwhelmingly superior races of
South Africa’.
...................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment