.:
Children and elders should work together topromot...: Children and elders should work together to promote love of nature---Dr Radhakrishnan’s exhortation on the Earth Day,2018 ( at Sabarm...
Monday, 23 April 2018
Children and elders should work together to
promote love of nature---Dr Radhakrishnan’s exhortation on the Earth Day,2018
( at
Sabarmati Yoga,Naturopathy Centre,Mitrapuram)
Thanks to the various
initiatives introduced recently to focus on the all-round environmental degradation, there
is a welcome change atleast in some quarters now. The Earth Charter, Earth
Day,Environmental Education Campaigns and similar efforts are gradually
influencing the global community on the need to restructure their attitude
towards nature.
It is
time that the elders demonstrated to the children the truth that Man always
lived in harmony with Nature and what sustained him in all the crisis he faced
in his profound, courageous and determined march towards unraveling the
mysteries of various kinds is his respect for all forms of life around him.
The symbiotic
relationship between man and nature can be fostered only by adopting a sincere
and holistic approach to prevent the ecological devastation. From theoretical
formulations and assertions we should learn to develop a new approach to foster
What has guided him in this long, very
often distressing and disappointing and at the same time lively search for
identify, is the realization of how everything in nature is
dependent on one
another. This is the core of the ancient wisdom.
The oriental traditions have been credited with established norms of
determining Man’s behavior towards Nature and its resources. Hinduism,
Buddhism, Jainism, Taoism and Confucianism have all treated nature with respect
and considered it as the source of Man’s happiness. The Vedas which were
considered to be the bedrock of Hindu religion and philosophy provide a world
view with regard to what is now generally called the ecological situation.
The Hindu
religion’s concern for peace and harmony in the environment is well reflected
in the famous hymn to the Earth in the Yajurved:
May there be peace in the celestial region
May there be peace in the atmosphere
May peace reign on earth
May the waters be soothing
May the herbs be soothing
May the plants be source of peace to all.
In Rigveda, the
sky is called father and the earth mother. The emphasis has been laid in many
hymns in the other Vedas and epics which for part of the Hindu literary
tradition. When the sky and earth are treated like the father and mother it is
meant to establish a symbolic relationship with the other objects of Nature
thereby constituting what can be called the Universal family of animals and
plants. From this, a theory of not only interdependence but respect for each
other and the need to protect everything in nature has been developed over the
years thought this emphasis got diluted later leading to not only
exploitation but
even utter neglect of nature. Mahabharata advocated the protection of trees
with utmost priority. Bhishma’s advice to the Pandava brothers is:
“Although trees
are solid, they have the properties of the sky. They have life, they flower and
bear fruit. They feel warmth and get dry when the sun is too hot and water is
scarce. It shows that they have a sense of touch. Fruits and flowers of the
tree fall down under the effect of thunder, air and fire…. The bad smell of
pollution makes them suffer as it changes their colour and flavor. It shows
that they can smell. They have sensory nerves. They take water from the roots.
If they have any disease the sprinkling of medicine cures them. On cutting them
they feel sorrow and when new branches appear they feel happy. This shows that
they have sense to feel happiness and sorrow and have sensory nerves”.
Worshipping of trees became a tradition and most of the villages in India
had Vriksha Devta (Goddes of tree) and Sacred Groves.
Tradition has it that in tribal belts there were instances of women marrying
trees.
Where did the drift begin?
The votaries of modernism, while they scoff at the ancient way of living
describing it barbaric or jungle life, seem to have forgotten the fact that it
is this very system that gave them all the tools that they are using now to
decry the worth of the foundation on which they stand. The problem with modern
man is that he now thinks that he is the conqueror of the universe and that he
has the proprietary rights over whatever he has conquered and this attitude
appears to be guiding him in most of his endeavours.
This self-centered philosophy, and the systems he has developed on the basis of
this outlook- the hallmark of which is the belief that nature has unlimited
resources for all time to come-govern modern man’s style of functioning. All of
us who were lulled into the newly acquired instruments of liberation which
science and technology put in our hands are rudely awakened by the alarm bells
ringing all around now. From the Himalayan heights of materialistic comforts
and beliefs we are being led to the abyss of all round environmental pollution,
ecological devastation, ozone depletion, green house effect and so on, creating
waves of shock in all thinking men and women.
The need for developing a nonviolent ecology
The importance of the ecosystem which was uppermost in the minds of our
forefathers, in maintaining the quiet rhythm and symphony of life ( not in the
musical sense) has become a thing of past. We had a sustainable ecosystem which
was rooted in a nonviolent ecology. Thus nonviolent ecology refers to a society
which is economically and socially just, ecologically sustainable, non-killing
and compassionate in relating to its environment.
Many people argue that since
violence is part of life, we need not worry about it. They find it to be
inherent and pervasive in nature and in human nature. One major point is that
violence and nonviolence are relative rather than absolute conditions. Some
regions are prone to violent forces in nature such as hurricanes or
earthquakes, however, there are other regions in which such violent forces are
negligible or even absent. Competitions and predation between animal species
can be violent, however, there are also nonviolent relations between species
such as mutualism.
Ecocentric rather than anthropocentric
Buddhism is ecocentric rather than anthropocentric since it views humans as an
integral part of nature. Buddhism focuses on the interaction of mind and nature
through the three practices of direct knowing, discriminating awareness and
deep compassion:
By cultivating these three practices, one’s actions in relation to the
environment come to be based in relationship and interconnectedness, rather
than in dualistic subject-object modes of separation. Through this approach,
one’s orientation to the world is fundamentally altered from dominant species
to member of a community, from part to process.
While environmentalism emphasizes that natural resources are limited, Buddhism
is more direct in encouraging individuals to limit their resources consumption
to the optimal satisfaction of the four basic needs of food, clothing, shelter
and medicine.
This vantage point
renders ecology a very concrete and personal matter.
We should
deal with nature the way we should deal with ourselves! We should not harm
ourselves, we should not harm nature. Harming nature is harming ourselves, and
vice-versa. If we knew how to deal with our self and with our fellow human
beings, we should know how to deal with nature. Human beings and nature are
inseparable. Therefore, by not caring properly for any one of these, we harm
them all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
SALT SATYAGRAHA----REFLECTIONS
KmÔnPnbpsS ZWvUnbntebv¡pÅ bm{XbpsS XpS¡hpw, D¸p kXym{Klw \ÂIp¶ ]mT§fpw þ HcmapJw tUm.F³.cm[mIrjvW³ k_ÀaXn B{ia¯n \n¶v KmÔnPn ZWv...
-
The Youthful Diary of Daisaku Ikeda – (continues) Chapter 4 : Lessons from The Diary What is my miss...
-
Challenges Before a Young Leader “I am keeping a diary, am I engraving a glimpse of my life for posterity? Will it remain in history? ...